
An animated picture features Chinese law enforcement official tracking back a fugitive who flees overseas with his ill-gotten asset during the Skynet operations, China's project to track down fugitives. Photo:VCG
Chinese lawmakers began reviewing a draft law on combating cross-border corruption on Tuesday, a legislation which experts believe would help close legal gaps in investigating overseas corruption, pursuing fugitives and recovering illicit assets, while strengthening international cooperation and corporate compliance.
The draft was submitted for its first reading to the ongoing session of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, the country's top legislature, per Xinhua News Agency.
Huo Zhengxin, a professor at the China University of Political Science and Law, told the Global Times that the draft law represents a dedicated piece of legislation within China's anti-corruption legal framework and a major step forward in the country's law-based governance of foreign-related affairs. It will fill a legislative gap in combating cross-border corruption, Huo said.
As Chinese companies expand business overseas, cross-border corruption cases face challenges in obtaining evidence abroad, pursuing fugitives and recovering illicit assets. Existing anti-corruption laws have faced limitations in addressing such cases involving foreign affairs, making such dedicated legislation necessary, Huo said.
Structured into six chapters and 47 articles, the draft sets out the principles, scope and key provisions underpinning China's efforts to combat cross-border corruption. It also defines relevant operational mechanisms and institutional responsibilities, and seeks to strengthen case handling and international cooperation.
The draft further clarifies enterprises' obligations regarding integrity and compliance, and specifies legal liabilities for violations.
As one of the experts involved in drafting the legislation, Huo said a key innovation of the draft is to strengthen international cooperation and corporate integrity and compliance obligations. As evidence, suspects and illicit assets in cross-border corruption cases are often located overseas, the draft provides mechanisms including extradition, mutual legal assistance and repatriation, while aligning with relevant rules under the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), said the expert.
The draft also makes clear that Chinese companies operating overseas, including both state-owned and private enterprises, have legal obligations to uphold integrity and compliance with domestic laws, Huo said.
The legislation would also codify practices accumulated through China's past campaigns against cross-border corruption, such as Sky Net and Fox Hunt operations, turning them into a more systematic legal framework and strengthening the law's deterrent effect, according to Huo.
The draft law is a practical step to regulate the development of cross-border businesses and help build a world-class business environment aligned with market principles, the rule of law and international standards, Xinhua noted.
It is also expected to expand the legal tools available to combat cross-border corruption and help address challenges in detecting corruption, collecting evidence, recovering illicit assets and securing convictions, according to the report.
In January, CCTV News reported on the case of a former senior executive of China National Offshore Oil Corporation, who was accused of accepting large amounts of bribes that were concealed overseas, with a businessman allegedly acting as a "front" to collect the illicit payments.
The draft's explicit corporate integrity and compliance requirements would make it harder for individuals to disguise bribery and other corrupt practices through overseas projects in an attempt to circumvent domestic oversight, while further clarifying the extraterritorial reach of China's anti-corruption laws, Huo said.
The draft also contains provisions to counter the use of foreign countries' domestic anti-corruption laws to exercise "long-arm jurisdiction" over Chinese companies, which Huo described as another important innovation in China's foreign-related legal framework.
China has been deepening its efforts in international anti-corruption cooperation, with 963 corrupt fugitives repatriated to the country in 2025, according to a work report from the country's top anti-graft body, Xinhua reported.
老胡没有“要求”张丹丹道歉,但我昨天写道:她“也许有必要对舆论做一个回应,该说明的说明,该致歉的致歉”。我今天也这样建议。我觉得那样的话,对她本人与公众沟通,度过眼前的危机可能有好处。

B | 张丹丹在《聊一波》节目里公开声称,灵活就是一种“福利”,因此灵活就业者的社会保障就应该低一些,激怒了全网舆论,根本没得洗。那段视频传递出她脱离现实,对灵活就业群体缺乏同情心的强烈信息。老胡尤其惊讶的是,《聊一波》不是直播,而是一档录播节目,也就是说如果张丹丹录制时出现口误的话,她本人或者节目制作方应该有机会纠正问题,避免引发烈度如此高的舆论风暴。然而问题就这样放过去了。人们只能理解为:张丹丹没有觉得这段话有严重不妥;节目编辑者如果不存恶意的话,也不觉得这段话可能给她带来灾难性的声誉打击。老胡查了劳动经济学的有关说法,的确存在补偿性工资差异理论,该模型假设劳动者可以自由选择,用一部分福利保障换取时间上的自由度。但该理论成立有一个前提,即劳动者拥有充分选择权,既可以选择稳定工作,也可以选择自由度更高的灵活就业。然而当下的现实是,大部分劳动者选择灵活就业是被动的。因为现实中正规稳定的岗位不足,很多人才会加入灵活就业大军谋生,而且那个群体中很多人的劳动强度和时间比稳定岗位工作者反而可能更高更多。这种情况下把一个假设理论拿到现实中来,宣扬灵活就业者在享受“福利”,并由此得出他们的社保就该低一些的结论,确实是荒谬的,让公众无法接受。老胡很难相信张丹丹教授作为北大国发院的副院长、博士生导师,区分不了劳动经济学中一个有明显前提的理论模型与我们当下实际情况的区别,我也无法相信她骨子里就是一个“坏人”“冷酷者”,对被动的灵活就业者毫无同情心。

C | 我看了她之前的一些发言,不仅很正常,而且显示她处在为灵活就业者争取权利的一线,比如她为给平台骑手们上社保大声疾呼,并且提出了很多具体建议。

D | 她似乎是中国学界为增加灵活就业群体权益做出最大实际努力的人之一。但她为什么会在节目中说出这番冷漠无情的话呢?老胡百思不得其解。我本人参加过很多视频录制,40分钟至60分钟的节目往往要录两个小时以上。

E | 做点善意的猜测:是否在这个过程中张丹丹讲了上边所说的劳动经济学的假设理论,然后在后期剪辑中没有突出这个理论的假设性,而被当成了张丹丹对现实的一种议论了呢?但如果是这样的话,张丹丹在节目播出之前看样片,应该指出来,要求修改,视频剪辑人也应该意识到这样播出有可能导致爆炸性的舆论事件,但为什么没有阻止呢?莫非张丹丹和节目制作方都不认为如此播出不会有太大问题?他们脱离互联网、脱离群众的程度真的如此严重吗?老胡一般都反对把一个说了错话的人往最坏的情况去想,下最极端的结论。老胡66岁了,我明确说:这个世界上没有那么多极端的坏人。

F | 把一个犯了一般错误的人往罪恶的方向去想,这绝不是好习惯。而且我看了张丹丹之前的各种发言之后,我认为在我们为自己看到的事情骂她的时候,不应该拒绝了解在我们没有看到的时候,她为灵活就业者还做过什么。

G | 然而无论如何,张丹丹说的那段话,特别是一个录播视频将那段话呈现出来的样子,就是挑衅了公众的情感,让无数人感到愤怒,也正是因为那段话的不可接受性太突出了、太强烈了,我感到有点诧异。

H | 所以我建议张丹丹做回应,该说明的说明,该致歉的致歉。

I |